There’ve been few videos more viewed in 2012 than the 40-second clip Pussy Riot uploaded last February. The video, which displays four women lip-synching in technicolor balaclavas, is one of the best-known YouTube clips of 2012. Weightier than Gangnam Style, more palatable than any campaign ad, the clip—which beckons those watching to “drive Putin away”—led to an international scandal and a worldwide swell of support.
The question is: why? Why is it that the women of Pussy Riot were able to craft a clip that redounded from Buenos Aires to Berlin, and led to anti-Putin protests at Russian embassies where none had existed before? Yes, Russian repression played a significant role in the video’s popularity. Pussy Riot’s shot to fame coincided with the Kremlin’s significant and perturbing crackdown on anti-Putin dissent.
But there are numerous protest videos, aired on a litany of causes, created every week. How is it that Pussy Riot’s managed to garner such acclaim?
Three researchers at The University of Texas think they’ve unlocked the formula for the video’s success. Last week, three electronic-commerce researchers filed a 45-page paper—”filled,” as Bloomberg Businessweek noted, “with equations and Greek letters”—examining why it is that certain YouTube videos find success online, while others wither and fall into the Internet’s great abyss.
The paper, written by Liangfei Qiu, Qian Tang, and Andrew Whinston, is quick to note that the success Pussy Riot garnered was not gained “through their musicality per se.” Rather, the success was created from a concoction of two distinct ingredients. The first was termed “social learning,” which dictates that the higher the video’s view count, the higher the likelihood it will be viewed. A snowball effect, this phenomenon derives from the reality that the more viewers a video reaches, the more voices and outlet it creates to be passed to further eyes.
This metric relates to the second phenomenon, termed “network effect.” This effect relies on further social nuance, stating that the more people who’ve viewed a video, the more the video becomes worth watching. After all, if the clip becomes familiar to all those within a social circle, those who’ve not viewed it risk landing outside the conversation—that is, if you have no idea why your friends are suddenly wearing hot-pink balaclavas, you run the risk of falling behind on social opportunities.
The researchers said that successful videos carry a ratio of approximately 60 percent network effect and 40 percent social learning. As it pertained to the Pussy Riot clip, which maintained that ratio, “most viewers were drawn to [the video] out of curiosity and were interested in the messages the music carried.” That initial interest then snowballed, with social learning and the network effect—as well as vocal support from Madonna and the Red Hot Chili Pepper’s Anthony Kiedis—buoying the clip.
Of course, it is just such popularity that landed three members of Pussy Riot in prison—part of the continued crackdown on dissidents throughout the post-Soviet world. But now that we’ve a fuller understanding of what leads to a successful video, perhaps the next round can continue to bring their plight to light—or, in the least, allow us a reprieve from anyone else purporting to have perfected the dance from Gangnam Style.
Photo by Rego Korosi on Flickr
Alma E. Ornelas:
Welcome back to Austin, Texas....baby!...
As a loyal Foundation member, my hat is off to the entire leadership of UT for b...
The price of Austin's urban rail, on a per mile basis, seems atrocious; perhaps ...
Great article on Chancellor's duties. All the Longhorn nation is excited for th...
For a response to Wallace Jefferson's argument, see http://www.city-journal.org/...